Pension reform: “Yes, I will vote for the cross-partisan censure motion”, declares Aurélien Pradié


European 1
modified to

11:46 a.m., March 20, 2023

While the motions of censure against the government are submitted to the vote of the National Assembly on Monday, Aurélien Pradié, deputy LR, announced on Europe 1 that he would vote this Monday afternoon the transpartisan motion of censure tabled by the group LIOT after the adoption of the pension reform. He explains his choice at the microphone of Sonia Mabrouk.

Political guest of the morning of Europe 1, Aurélien Pradié, MP LR, declared that he would vote for the cross-party censure motion tabled by MP Charles de Courson after the adoption of the pension reform via article 49.3 of the Constitution.

“I took this decision as a patriot who can no longer bear to see the spectacle of democratic weakening. I think that the real responsibility is to get out of chaos. To get out of it, you have to vote for the motion of censure,” he said. he continued. MP LR also indicated that he will vote for this motion as an “electroshock”. “I think Emmanuel Macron needs this electric shock,” he said.

Aurélien Pradié also called for a rally: “We cannot let our country fracture as it is today. We have to unite”.

out of the chaos

The deputy LR specifies that the vote of the motion of cross-partisan censure does not engage in a “common political project” with the other oppositions. “I refused to shirk. It would surely have been easier to hide and not vote for it,” he added.

Aurélien Pradié declares measuring the scope of this vote, which can bring down the government: “I do not take this question lightly. All of this is not just distraction and fun. I have been a deputy for more than six years. Rarely have I been aware of a responsibility like this.” He also believes that this motion of censure can contribute to getting out of the “chaos”.

By voting for this motion of cross-partisan censure, MP LR goes against the instructions of his party. This does not scare him: “I think that the time is no longer for our little internal squabbles or the little crises of authority of each other. That is not the subject”.



Source link -74